Teachers’ Social Security?

Teaching does have its rewards, but in Texas they sure aren’t economic.  

   Folks who have chosen teaching in Texas as a follow-on career, as I have done, must be nuts.  Either this or they just love kids and teaching, as I do, more than they love the prospect of a comfort- able retirement.  This is because of two Federal laws, the Govern- ment Pension Offset (GPO) and the Windfall Elimination Provision (WEP).  It is also because:  Federal tax code restrictions disallow Individual Retirement Account (IRA) contribution tax credits for individuals contributing to a pension plan other than Social Secur- ity; many school districts in Texas do not participate in Social Security, and; teachers in Texas are not given a choice on whether to participate in the state’s Teacher Retirement System (TRS).

   The details associated with this conundrum are complicated and confusing.  Conundrum?  Webster defines it as a question or an intricate and difficult problem having only a conjectural answer, or a riddle whose answer either involves a pun or is a pun.  So, some- body please correct me on all this if my understanding of the situation is flawed, but with so many in the Congress these days hell-bent to screw with it, I think the term, “social security,” is itself a pun.

   The Association of Texas Professional Educators (ATPE), of which I am a proud member, has it essentially right.  The TRS in Texas is a better program than Social Security.  Its monthly benefits paid out to retired participants are substantially greater than those distributed to Social Security retirees.  But this is only true for those who have had a substantial number of creditable years of service as teachers here in Texas.  Those who teach fewer than ten years or are younger than fifty-five and have taught fewer than five years will have wasted their time and money by contributing.  And, did you know that the average male going directly into teaching after graduating from college in Texas only teaches for two years?  It’s true.  The pay and the working conditions in many districts are that bad.  Also on the plus side for TRS are retirees’ health insurance, return-to-work benefits, and life insurance.  But again, these benefits are only available to retirees who complete minimum service eligibility requirements.

   Some believe that making Social Security coverage mandatory would solve the problems that educators experience due to the GPO and WEP.  But I don’t.  Neither does ATPE.  We recognize that this would only serve to damage TRS and other state pension funds.  An alternative not often talked about by ATPE, our other state teacher unions, or our Texas legislators, would be to allow teachers to choose whether or not to participate in TRS.

   At age sixty-two, I’ve been a TRS participant in Texas for three years now.  So, at age sixty-five, as I understand the current rules, I will be eligible for some level of TRS annuity.  Fortunately, I had more than thirty years of substantial income with Social Security contributions being made before becoming a teacher, so my pension from Social Security should not be greatly affected.  Neither will my military retirement.  Thank God for that.  But I’m in an enviable situation; the numbers just happen to work in my favor.  By my rough calculations, however, and I do mean rough because the WEP offset and retirement calculation formulas of both TRS and Social Security aren’t easy for social science majors like myself to follow (they’re also subject to change and no one expects them to become more liberal), I’ll have to work full time as a teacher until after my seventieth birthday to just break even.  This is true even though the Texas 79th Legislature passed a revision to TRS eligibility requirements that obviate the notorious Rule of Eighty for retirees who are sixty-five or older and have at least five years of service.  It’s still true because of income tax disadvantages and the reduction I will incur to my social security income for the years that I do not contribute.  The other advant- ages of TRS, however, the medical and life insurance offered to retirees, plus to return-to-work benefits, I anticipate will help to compensate for this lost income.

   The Government Pension Offset (GPO) doesn’t really concern me or my wife.  It’s an offset provision in Social Security law that reduces spousal Social Security benefits for public employees who are eligible for government pensions such as those provided by TRS.  When I am gone, if I live long enough, my wife will have her own retirement income plus a portion of my military retirement owing to the years we have paid into the military retirement Survivor’s Benefit Plan.  The spouses of others employed by the state here in Texas are not so fortunate.

   The tax code that precludes Individual Retirement Account (IRA) contribution tax credits does impact us, my wife and me.  As a hedge against the prospect of my not being able to finish a full five years worth of teaching for some reason, I have been contrib- uting monthly to a traditional IRA.  But, even though we are buying our own home, claimed no personal exemptions, had extra money deducted from both our salaries, had substantial profes- sional expenses, and contributed generously to our church and other qualified charities last year, we did little better than break even on our income taxes.  Tax cuts?  Apparently not for those of us in the middle class, thank you very much Mr. Bush.  Given our joint income tax bracket, the IRA tax credit, for which we would have been eligible the past three years had I not been contributing to TRS, would have helped a lot.

   Before I conclude this little crying session, on behalf of all state public servants in this country, I want to publicly thank The Honorable Howard (Buck) McKeon, United States Congressman from California, one of the primary sponsors of the Social Security Fairness Act (a resolution for the full repeal of the GPO and WEP), the 321 other members of the House of Representatives who support this bill, and 28 bipartisan senators who support a similar resolution in the Senate.  For more information on this and to find out what you can personally do to help Congress get this bill out of committee and onto the floor for a vote, CLICK HERE to visit the National Education Association’s website.

   Again I say, if I’ve not stated things as they really are for teachers here in Texas, or if someone has a different take on this reality, I will gratefully accept correction.  Otherwise, please go to the polls in November with your public servants in-mind and give no heed to politicians’ rhetoric claiming to have done teachers a great service anytime in recent history.

   Now, if I can just live long enough and stay well…  hmmmm, school starts again in just little more than a week.  Then I won’t have so much time on my hands for all these blog postings. Do I hear a HOOAH out there!

To post a comment, click on the tiny COMMENTS word below.

Published in: on July 27, 2006 at 4:25 pm  Comments (13)  

The Sweetest Sound

A Short Story on the Importance of Remembering Others’ Names, Plus Some Advice on Doing it Better

I can’t claim to be an expert at remembering others’ names.  Some seem to have a knack for it, whereas I do not.  At least I try now though, unlike I used to be and some I know who still are either too lazy or too uncaring to give it much effort.  Hard as I try, however, I’m often embarrassed when I meet someone I know but am unable to recall their name.  Unless I am able to bluff convincingly, as the following little trip down memory lane illustrates, or else my acquaintance is very graceful, it’s always a terribly uncomfortable situation to be in.

The Chevrolet dealership was still open when I drove up in my slightly-used, ’67 Camero; the tires still had a good 25,000 miles worth of tread on them.  It was almost six o’clock when I entered the showroom and recognized my salesman.  I couldn’t recall his name, but I knew what he looked like.  He was standing up to greet me from behind an old grey metal desk.  As I shook his pro-offered hand, I asked him if my new Corvette had been delivered yet.

“Garry, right — Lieutenant Garry from Ft. Walters?” he asked.  “Like wild oats,” he then said with a big grin in response to my nod.  I was impressed that he remembered me, but then, remembering people was important for the business he was in.

“It’s out on the side gett’n a bath,” he said.  “Go take a look, then come-on back in with the paperwork on your trade-in.  I’ll have you troll’n South Main before the sun goes down.”

There she was, the car of my dreams, a white convertible with red interior.  1968 — perhaps not the best model year for Corvette, maybe even the worst as most Corvette affectionados will tell you.  But she was beautiful, the first of the new Stingray design.

“This heyer y’new wheels, Mist-ah?” asked the weathered old black man, one of the first of his race I had seen since arriving in Weatherford, Texas three weeks earlier.  He was hunkered down with a garden hose in one hand and a terry-cloth towel in the other one washing off a thin layer of dust from the driver’s side of my car.  His overalls, fastened over only one shoulder, were rolled up almost to his knees revealing the tops of well-worn rubber galoshes. 

“Yes… yes it is,” I said, committing myself to a loving relationship before signing a contract or even before touching her.  For me, the car had been a mail-order bride and I was saying, “I do,” to her in my heart as I stood there.  The detail man, watching me with a smile on his face, was our witness.

“Well, you sho a lucky young genalman, suh, un ah’ll be sure ta take good care of ‘er fo ya.”

The salesman had been good to his word.  The sun was just setting as I drove back toward the center of town on Ft. Worth Street.  I had just taken my first drive after signing on the dotted line, experiencing the sport car’s quick response to my every command as I drove east out of town to The County Line.  This was the closest place to Weatherford from which one could legally buy anything alcoholic to drink.  A six-pack of Budweiser now rested behind the bucket seats for the upcoming weekend.

Before me, as I came to a stop for the red-light at an intersection, was the stately, old Parker County courthouse.  But I wasn’t much interested in Texas architecture at that moment.  I was chill’n to the sounds of a Ray Charles ballad and my new car’s 350 inch V8 at idle.  Out of the corner of my eye, however, I did notice a little blue car pull up beside me.  Feeling someone’s eyes on me, checking me out, me and my new car that is, I turned to look and I noted a Volkswagen beetle.  The eyes belonged to a young lady behind the wheel of the beetle, a very nice-looking young lady.

“Hello,” I said as smoothly as I could.  “I was just on my way to get a shake at the Dairy Queen.  Wanna meet me there?”

She smiled in a sheepish sort of way, and I took that for a yes.  And I smiled in a wolfish sort of way as I noticed the little blue car in my rear view mirror following me around the courthouse and down South Main to the only “in place” in town back then.

“Looks brand new… is it?” she asked after pulling up on my right side and turning off her car’s engine.

“Sure is.  I just got it tonight,” I answered.  “Wanna be the first to sit co-pilot while I go for treats?”

“Okay,” she said after the slightest hesitation.

“What would you like?” I asked, opening her car door first then my own on the passenger side.

“Umm… a chocolate dipped-cone would be nice,” she said, slipping into the bucket seat.

Nice legs, I thought to myself as I walked away to place our order, returning a few moments later with both hands full.

I looked down at the little chocolate-covered swirl of ice-cream on the top of my guest’s treat, and the temptation was just too great.  I bit it off before handing her the rest.  It wasn’t a very gallant thing to do, but back then I wasn’t a very gallant kind of guy.  When I saw something I wanted, I went for it.

“Augh,” she groaned. “How could you?”

“Just making sure it was safe,” I said with a wink, but not at all confident that I hadn’t already dashed any chance I might have had with this, my “first bite” for the evening.  I was relieved when she smiled at the sorry excuse I had given for my behavior, an attempt at humor.

After a short “demo” ride with this young lady down South Main, we came right back to her parked bug.  It was a school night for her and I still had more troll’n to do, so we exchanged names and a few details about ourselves then said goodnight.  She was a local girl attending classes at the University of Texas at Arlington.  But the most important detail about her, as far as I was concerned at the time, was her phone number, which I was able to get.  I wrote it down on the inside of a matchbook cover.  I failed, however, to write down her name.

Saturday came and I had a few good prospects for the evening, but my first choice was the blond with the nice-looking legs in the blue Volkswagen.  With the phone in my hand and the book of matches open before me, I started dialing, then I stopped, hanging up the phone.  What was her name?  I asked myself.  Try as I may, I simply could not remember it.

After a second cup of morning coffee, I decided on a ploy: I would dial again.  Then, when someone answered, if it sounded like her voice I would simply say, hello and give my name.  If it should be a woman’s voice but not sound like hers, I would assume it to be her mother and simply announce myself then ask to speak with her daughter, not using a name.  Likewise, if a man should answer, I would assume it to be her father and do the same.  As it turned out, it was her mother who answered.  After giving my name, I was told that she, meaning her daughter, had already gone out for the day but that she had left a message for me in the event that I should call.  Drat!  I was hoping that her mother would say her name, but she didn’t.

“She said to tell you that it’s okay for tonight,” her mother told me.  Then, after giving me directions to the house, she said, “Come by at six.”

Yes!  So far, so good.

I was there right at six, the sun being low in the western sky when I drove up.  Among the many other things the Army had already taught me, I had learned to be on-time.  I had also learned about something called “field expediency,” using whatever is at hand to accomplish the mission when the correct weapon or tool isn’t available.  My plan was to trick her into saying her name again somehow during the evening without reveling the fact that I couldn’t remember it.  After-all, there is no sound sweeter than the sound of one’s own name, and I didn’t want to signal the fact that cared more about her great-looking legs at this stage of our relationship than I did about who she was as a person.  I instinctively knew that it is our names, perhaps more than anything else about us, that project us to others as individuals.

I rang the bell anticipating one of the parents to answer and hoping that they would call out to my date by name, saying that her young man was here.  But, no such luck.  I was met at the door by my date herself.  Lovely… She was wearing a nice print dress, I noticed, if not exactly seasonal, but Texas winters do tend to be warmer than what I had grown up used to in Utah.  What I noticed most, however, is that now she had long hair worn in a pageboy-style.  When I had first met her, it had been much shorter, so I was a bit startled.  I knew she could not have grown that much hair in such a short time.

Noticing my look of surprise, she smiled as I escorted her to my car and said, “It’s a fall.”

“Oh,” I said, not having heard the term, fall, before but, assuming that it meant a hair piece of some kind, I said,  “Very nice!”

Walking around the back of the car after closing my date’s door for her, I formulated a quick plan.  Then, closing my door and starting the engine… Vroooom (I gave it a little more gas than necessary anticipating that the car’s throaty roar would quicken my date’s pulse), “Wearing your hair down that way makes you look a bit like Elizabeth Montgomery,” I said.

“You mean Samantha the witch?”

“Yeah, Samantha on Bewitched, the TV show.  In fact, I think I’ll call you Sam samvette.jpgtonight because you are so bewitching.”

And that’s how the story began, the story of my thirty-eight year relationship with Miss Natalie DeBeauford of Weatherford, Texas.  Since that evening, as my sweetheart, later my fiance, and later still as my bride, she has been Sam to me, to my family, to our mutual friends, and even to her father while he was still with us.  He had encouraged us to be together and to stay together.  God bless him for that.

Turns out, I made lemonade out of lemons that evening.  But I’d been lucky, and one cannot always count on luck.  Since then I’ve learned an important lesson:  If you want to remember a person’s name you’ve got to want to remember it and be willing to make an effort.  It’s got to be important to you or it’s just not going to happen.

For some more tips on how to do a better job at remembering others’ names, click the MORE button. (more…)

Published in: on July 25, 2006 at 3:14 pm  Comments (4)  

It Works Both Ways

  A lesson learned in making inter-racial relationships work.

 This is how I remember it. The year was 1967 and I was a young Army officer in-training to become a helicopter pilot at Ft. Wolters, Texas.  My classmates and I were preparing for Combat in Vietnam, which was about to reach its climax during the Têt Offensive of ‘68.  A lot was going on in my heart and mind at the time.
Pilot Kent  After having received my first month’s paycheck as a 2d lieutenant in flight school, basic-pay, full “per-diem,” and flight-pay, I had decided that I could finally afford something that I had always wanted, a new corvette.  Considering my options in the Chevrolet dealership showroom one Saturday morning (a red one, a blue one, or a white one for which I would have to wait on delivery), I met one of my fellow classmates, Marvin Adams.  Marvin was in the driver’s seat of my blue option.  I greeted him, not remembering his name but easily remembering his face.  He was the only black officer in our class.
  “How do I look?” he asked.
  “Like an accident looking to happen,” I answered.

(more…)

Published in: on July 13, 2006 at 4:09 pm  Comments (1)  

Infamous Politics

Things in Texas are pretty bad, infamous in fact.  This is because politics have deviated from traditional, democratic principles of fairness and equal representation for all citizens, generating news outside of the state, news that’s being reported by big, national newspapers such as the Chicago Tribune.  Yes, folks, we are infamous.

Writing from her office in Washington, D.C., Marini Goldbergs’ article begins:  “When the Texas Republican Party adopted its platform recently, party leaders left no question as to the impor- tance it placed on religion.  Another portion of the platform has stirred additional concerns.  ‘We pledge to exert our influence toward a return to the original intent of the 1st Amendment and dispel the myth of the separation between church and state,’ the document reads.”

Myth?!?!  When the government puts its imprimatur on a particular religion it conveys a message of exclusion to all those who do not adhere to the favored beliefs. A government cannot be premised on the belief that all persons are created equal when it asserts that God prefers some.Supreme Court Justice Harry A. Blackmun in the Lee v. Weisman ruling, 1992.

Click Here for more information concerning the Constitutional basis for the Separation of Church and State.

“In Texas and elsewhere,” Ms. Goldburg’s article continues, “debates on social and cultural issues have blurred the line between faith and politics.  Fights over gay marriage, abortion and school prayer reflect and exacerbate the rift between religious conserv- atives, other believers, and the more secular-minded.  The platform calls America a ‘Christian nation, founded on Judeo-Christian principles,’ and that has drawn a frustrated reaction from Jewish groups that consider the language exclusionary.”

READ GOLDBERG’s FULL ARTICLE

If you haven’t already read my blog posting, A Christian Nation?, please do so, because the line is crossed when politicians use religion as a prop in their campaigns, when partisanship is made a prerequisite of faith.  That’s when the separation of church and state ceases to be a fundamental principle of true democracy helping to ensure the freedom and liberty of all citizens, whether they be Christian, Jew, Muslim, Hindu, Agnostic, or whatever.

In the words of William Bendix playing Chester A. Riley in the 1950s TV show, The Life of Riley, “What a revoltin’ development this is!”

To post a comment, click on the tiny COMMENTS word below.

Published in: on July 11, 2006 at 1:50 pm  Leave a Comment  

The Next Closest Thing

Over coffee with friends following a great dinner out recently, the husband of the other couple said, “Methodist huh?  That’s the next closest thing to Unitarianism.”

My mind immediately went back to a book my wife and I had read together some time back, The Gentle Art of Verbal Self-Defense, by Suzette Haden Elgin.  Chapter One:  The Four Basic Rules.  First, Know that you’re under attack.  Second, know what kind of attack you’re facing.  Third, know how to make your defense fit the attack.  Fourth, know how to follow through.

Our friend’s comment, as innocent as it may have seemed, was a verbal attack.  But I wasn’t surprised by it, so I was not at a disadvantage.  Knowing this gentleman fairly well too, I recognized that it was meant to engage us in a your faith/my faith debate.  I also knew that this man was not a seriously-committed believer himself.  So, I quickly formulated a defense.  I chose first to draw him out more, to investigate his arsenal.

“I’ve heard that said before,” I said, “stated different ways perhaps.  But how have you come to believe this about Methodists?”

“Oh, just what I’ve heard.”

Having set him up for an appropriate defense I then asked, “So, you’ve not actually inquired from any authoritative source just what Methodists do believe?”

“No, but I’ve heard from others who have, and they say that Methodists don’t know what they believe.”

Okay, I had successfully employed the first three principles.  Notice, I chose not to respond indignantly or with an overly aggressive re-tart.  There’s no faster way to loose a verbal argument than to loose your cool.  Often, it’s exactly what your opponent wants.  Remember, verbal self-defense is a Gentle Art.  Questions are a great deal more gentle than statements.

“Well, I may not be the best authority on the subject, but I have been a seriously-practicing Methodist for many years now.  Would you like to hear what I believe?”  This was the initiation of my follow through, the fourth principle.  It was an opportunity for evangelism that I was not going to pass-up on if given the invitation.

“Sure, tell me.”

(more…)

Published in: on July 10, 2006 at 3:00 pm  Leave a Comment  

What if Diplomacy Fails?

Don’t you just love what-If questions?  I do — they make me think.  They make me have to… speculate.  And when I speculate, based on an infinite number of variables, I can think up all manner of possible futures.  Let me give you an example.  First, some background…

My wife and I started surprising our friends and relatives a couple of months ago with the announcement, “We’re going to be parents again.”  We loved to watch their jaws drop open when we said this.  In response to this, one of the daughters of some couple-friends of ours said, “Naaaa… that’s impossible!”  At that, everyone had a good laugh.  Then we completed our announcement, “We’re going to host a foreign exchange student for the following school year.” 

Jeong Hae Yun (she wants to be called Betsy), a sixteen year-old girl from South Korea, will be part of our family beginning this August through at least the end of May next year, and we’re really excited about it.  We’ve been empty-nesters for over fifteen years now, and we have missed the sense of purpose that comes from having a young person living with us.  She may even become one of my World Geography students because she will be attending classes on the same campus were I teach in Waxahachie, Texas.  But what if something terrible happens on the Korean peninsula and surrounding area while she is here?

(more…)

Published in: on July 9, 2006 at 3:27 am  Leave a Comment  

By Dawn’s Early Light

This posting, as the title suggests, is about patriotism and how it seems to be waning in the United States these days, even though we’re in the midst of a war for our very survival as a nation.  This isn’t the first time, however, that these words from Francis Scott Key’s famous poem have been used for a title.  They were used also for the title of a made-for-TV movie back in the 1990s.  The movie wasn’t so much about patriotism though.  It was a low-budget remake of two earlier movies about the same thing, Failsafe and Dr. Strangelove (or how I Learned to stop worrying and love the bomb). 

I believe that, as an art-form, American-made movies tend to chronicle shifts in our national attitude, the evolution of our collective culture, and they say a lot about us to people overseas too.  For example, some sex interest was included in the By Dawn’s Early Light version of the Cold War’s worst nightmare scenario:  the pilot of a bomber zeroing-in on Moscow had a female co-pilot, a situation that clouded his judgment and resolve in carrying out his mission.  Ughhh… Only in America!

(more…)

Published in: on July 7, 2006 at 7:32 pm  Leave a Comment  

If Only Politicians Could Connect the Dots

If only politicians could connect the dots, they would be able to see where their actions and inactions are headed.  Too bad they’re so myopic.  Too bad they’re so worried about getting re-elected that they cannot agree to act beyond their own and their own consti- tuents’ near-term self-interests.  Too bad because our kids and grandkids will be left with both the consequences and the bills.

Scientists can connect the dots.  They are experts at seeing cause-and-effect relationships, like Darwin was.  Darwin saw two obviously related species of birds on separate but proximate islands in the Galapagos archipelago, each looking very much alike except for very different-looking beaks.  Darwin observed that the food the birds had to eat differed on the two islands.  On one island, there were a plethora of insects.  On the other, where there were far fewer insects, there was an abundance of hard seeds produced by drought-resistant plants.  The relationship was self-evident to Darwin:  One species had evolved into two subspecies through a process that is known today as the theory of evolution.  Random genetic variations in beak size and shape, passed on from parent birds to their young, had favored the survival and subsequent procreation of some, while discouraging others.  Darwin connected the dots, then he wrote his famous book, The Origin of Species.

(more…)

Published in: on July 6, 2006 at 9:23 pm  Comments (1)  

A Christian Nation?

A Christian nation we might want to be, but we’re not, not by a long shot.  I don’t say this because, as teachers, we may not lead prayer in public schools.  Neither do I say this because in some states it’s still legal for persons of the same sex to marry, or that Roe vs. Wade has yet to be overturned.  I say this because all protestant denominations in this country are steadily loosing members, and the Catholics are just barely hanging on, mostly because of the steady growth of Hispanic immigrants, legal and otherwise   (STATISTICS).  The fastest growing religion in the United States, according to a Department of Defense publication is… brace yourself… Islam. 

According to a Harper’s Magazine article, the Christian Paradox, dated August 2005, 85 percent of Americans claim to be Christian, while only 75 percent say they ever pray.  Only 50 percent ever darken the door of a church, and only 33 percent can claim regular (more than once-in-awhile) church attendance.  Only 40 percent can identify more than four of the Ten Commandments, and twelve percent actually believe that Joan of Arc was Noah’s wife.  Christian nation?  Give me a break!

I say that we are not a Christian nation also because too many of my brothers and sisters in this country think that discrimination is okay and that the Constitution should be ammended accordingly.  Christian behavior?  Not in my book.

If the current majority party in Congress becomes any more successful, the minority in this country, the so-called Moral Majority, will be dictating morality for all the rest of us, and it seems these days like we’re creeping up fast on that reality.  Evangelical Christians are cranking up the “political” rhetoric as the November congressional elections draw near, and the Democratic Party is attempting to fight fire with fire.  I can’t say as I blame them, but so much for the separation of church and state.

One often hears our more fundamental kin claim that the Founding Fathers were Christian.  Well, “I hope both they and the people who say the Founders were all atheists or agnostics will do more reading,” says David Holmes, a church historian at the College of William & Mary in Williamsburg, Va., and author of The Faiths of the Founding Fathers.  Neither side of this argument, so it seems, has history on their side.  Read the full story in the Christian Science Monitor

To post a comment, click on the tiny COMMENTS word below.

Published in: on July 5, 2006 at 7:32 pm  Leave a Comment  

A 260-Million Dollar Experiment

We are about to begin an expensive experiment here in Texas, an experiment that will eventually prove that business-style economic incentives for teachers, which are tied to students’ performance on TAKS (Texas Assessment of Knowledge and Skills) tests, create more problems than they solve.  Governor Rick Perry, a politician who, as far I can determine, has never spent a day in a classroom as a teacher, has long advocated merit pay for teachers.  Now it’s a done-deal.  He is convinced, according to a Dallas Morning News article dated June 12, 2006, that this merit-pay program will push Texas to the forefront of national educational standards.  But, if only teachers in Texas could vote in the upcoming gubernatorial election, I personally doubt that he could be reelected.

On June 29th, according to a posting in Chron.com, Governor Perry poured praises on Texas educators in front of a statewide teachers’ group, The Texas Classroom Teachers’ Association, reminding them that it was he who signed into law their upcoming $2,000 across-the-board pay raise.

Thank you very much, Mr. Perry, but I’m quite sure that we teachers in Texas are still being paid less than the national average (The Cost of Underpaying Texas Teachers).  Despite this fact, Governor Perry said during the news conference, “When it comes to teacher compensation, I am of the belief that you can never pay a good teacher enough because of a lifelong impact that he or she has upon children.  That doesn’t mean we shouldn’t do more,” Perry said, drawing applause from the Texas Classroom Teachers Association.  But he was treated with complete silence from the group when he defended the state’s standardized student testing program and took a swipe at Democratic opponent Chris Bell for advocating reducing the role for testing in public schools.

Bell has said that he wants to end high-stakes testing in Texas and “teaching to the test” in schools.  He has said that he wants the Texas Assessment of Knowledge and Skills test to be used, but for diagnostic purposes.  I have been hearing most of my fellow teachers saying that they agree with candidate Bell.

“The high-stakes nature of the TAKS test is corrupting our curriculum and driving teachers from the profession.  Teachers don’t like being treated like glorified test monitors and then being paid accordingly,” said Bell’s spokesman, Jason Stanford. “And that’s why Rick Perry heard crickets today at the teacher conference.”

In my humble opinion, merit pay in Texas will be even less popular with teachers than has been No Child Left Behind (NCLB).  I don’t doubt that merit pay will improve test scores in some instances, but I fail to see how it will do much to improve learning.  The two are not the same thing.  Josef Albers, a famous German immigrant teacher and artist once said, “Good teaching is more a giving of right questions than a giving of right answers.”  More time spent drilling students on likely TAKS test questions means less time spent asking the right questions and helping students learn how to think.
                                                       
Still to be determined on a district-by-district basis, is just how the merit-pay money will be rewarded.  Teachers and educational administrators all know that coming up with equitable formulas for this will be difficult if not impossible.  That’s why Austin is leaving this part of the program for districts to figure out.  Disgruntled, past-over educators will have no recourse beyond local school boards for complaints.

To illustrate why merit-pay award schemes will all fail the fairness test, consider my situation.  I teach World Geography to high-school freshmen, a social studies subject that is quite comprehensive.  It includes some earth science, some biology, some climatology, some history, some government, some economics, some language, some art, etc., etc.  But the social studies TAKS is not administered until students’ junior year.  It covers all social studies subjects, each taught at different grade levels, but with an emphasis on U.S. history.

Now, let’s say student Johnny Q’s social studies TAKS results turn out to be stellar.  Great!  But to whom to we give the credit?  To whom do we give the reward, his 11th grade history teacher, me, or his 3d grade teacher who made the greatest, albeit unmeasurable contribution by working above and beyond the call inspiring Johnny to enjoy reading?  We teachers all know that the TAKS is primarily a reading test.  So, in theory at least, how well Johnny did was the cumulative effect of a variable string of teachers and classroom environments, to say nothing of home and community environments, that none of Johnny’s teachers involved had the least bit of control over. 

All plans for distribution of merit-pay dollars devised by districts must comply with guidelines developed by state Education Commissioner, Shirley Neeley, who also will approve each application for an incentive pay grant.  Districts are not required to participate, but few are expected not to.  It’s big money.

Merit pay for teachers will have another effect too, an effect that our legislators don’t seem to care about.  Surely it has been brought to their attention; teachers’ groups have been providing Austin with every argument at their disposal for the past eleven years or more to combat the growing support for this idea.  When teachers begin to compete with one another for merit-pay awards to supplement their meager wages, cooperation between teachers will wane, especially between the seasoned, more experienced teachers and the younger ones.  How tragic!

To post a comment, click on the tiny COMMENTS word below.

Published in: on July 4, 2006 at 10:15 pm  Comments (2)  

Making Disciples

There is an interesting article in the Summer 2006 publication of the United Methodist Men’s magazine.  The heading of this article reads:  “Nearly half of U.S. congregations did not receive a member by profession of faith.”  Of course, the article is speaking only of United Methodist congregations, although I remember reading somewhere else that this is true for most Christian denominations.  In this same article, it is reported that Bishop Michael Coyner, president of the General Board of Discipleship, told the Board that this situation, which is steadily growing worse, is causing all kinds of other problems, “including,” he said, “our ability to stand before God and say we are doing a good job in making disciples.”

I suspect the bishop is correct in saying this, and I fear that our own congregation is not doing too well either in terms of living up to our mission statement, i.e., Making Disciples for Jesus Christ.  Although some of you may disagree, this isn’t just me talking.  Our consultant, Tom Bandy said pretty much the same thing in his written report.  Except for one adult baptism that I recall pastor Daniel performed last year, I do not think that we had any other new members by profession of faith.  If this is a good measure of how well we are doing our mission, what then are we doing wrong?  What should we be doing to make disciples?

It seems self-evident to me that, before we can make disciples, we must first be disciples ourselves.  Scripture is pretty clear on what it means to be a disciple.  In the Old Testament, MICAH 6:8 says, “The Lord has told you, human, what is good; He has told you what He wants from you:  to do what is right to other people, love being kind to others, and live humbly, obeying your God.”  In the New Testament, Jesus Himself tells us in MARK 8:34-35, “If anyone would come after me, he must deny himself and take up his cross and follow me.  For whoever wants to save his life will lose it, but whoever loses his life for me and for the gospel will save it.”

Hmmm… deny himself.  OUCH!

Alright, let’s say, just for the sake of argument, that I do deny myself and that I do take up my cross daily.  Although I admittedly have much room to grow in this regard, let’s say that I am a disciple, even if only a fledgling one.  How do I begin making other disciples?  What does the Bible say about this?

Well, the most obvious reference that I’ve found is in MATTHEW 28:19-20, “Go therefore and make disciples of all the nations, baptizing them in the name of the Father and of the Son and of the Holy Spirit, teaching them to observe all things that I have commanded you; and lo, I am with you always, even to the end of the age.”

Go, therefore, and make disciples…  baptizing them… teaching them.  Hmmm… Sounds a lot like evangelism to me, something that most of us would say that we’re not very good at doing.  Of course, we do have to leave the baptizing to our clergy, but the other we can do, we can teach.  And what’s the best way to teach?  Why, by example, of course.

Making disciples, I believe, is pretty much like assuming the responsibilities of being a parent.  What I remember about that is this:

  • Until they learn to feed themselves, we must make sure they are fed.
  • We teach them how to feed themselves as soon as possible.
  • If they get into trouble, we help them — even if it is inconvenient, because they are, after all, our top priority.
  • We train them to do what they need to do.
  • We teach them what we know.
  • We protect them from danger until they can protect themselves.
  • Last but most important, we spend time with them, because people do learn best by example.

Our goal, in making disciples, is to eventually reproduce ourselves, assuming, of course that we are already mature, adult disciples ourselves.  We produce other believers who can stand, as we do, on our own, and reproduce themselves.  Of course, few of us individually have the opportunity to be in such close relationships with others.  We touch others briefly, then we go our separate ways.  Few of us too ever get a chance to be involved in the whole process, or to even see the harvest.  All we get to do is plant seeds here and there, cultivate the soil now and again, cast a little fertilizer or give a little drink.  It does take a village, after all.  And Church of the Disciple is a village.

Some so-called Evangelists seem to think that making disciples means imposing their “Christian” morality on others through legislation.  But this, I believe, is wasting missional energy.  Christ did not impose Himself on others.  He was given all power to do so, was he not?  But, instead, He used His energy to do good works, to teach, and show love and mercy.  Then He gave His people a choice, clearly distinguishing between the secular and sacred in MATTHEW 22:21, saying, “Give to Caesar the things that are Caesar’s, and give to God the things that are God’s.” Jesus turned sadly away when others, such as in the story of the rich young ruler told in LUKE 18:18-23, found discipleship too much of a cross to bear.

May I suggest to you that, to be an effective maker of disciples at Church of the Disciple, you would do well to commit yourself in a ministry or mission cell group.  An adult Sunday School class would be a good place to start.  Other cell groups at the church include:  the United Methodist Men, the United Methodist Women, Stephen Ministry, the Missions committee, the Worship committee, the Ushers, the Choir, etc.  You will find like-thinking people in these cell groups, people who will minister to you and people to whom you can minister.  Lovingly hold yourself and others accountable.  Then, invite others into your group.  Give them opportunities for service, and teach them all that you know.  Together, ably led by our new pastor, the Reverend Dr. Ouida Lee, we can all grow in discipleship.

May the Lord Himself be with you as you live out your faith, denying yourself and taking up your cross daily, that you might bear much fruit in the process of making disciples.

Amen ~

To post a comment, click on the tiny COMMENTS word below.

Published in: on July 1, 2006 at 4:27 pm  Comments (4)  

Disinformation, It’s Everywhere

One of my sons has asked me to pen a post on how I feel about the news media these days.  Spin by the media has long been a sore spot with him, so here goes.

I too feel violated sometimes, son, especially when the spin runs counter to my own views and persuasions.  But reporters are not the only ones who are guilty of violating our trust.  What about big corporations such as Exxon, Enron, R. J. Reynolds, Worldcom, etc.? What about political action committees?  Indeed, what about our own government?

“But a much more interesting question is what happens to the whole concept of ‘media bias’ in the age of the Internet and globalization,” says Jesse Walker in his article, Trusting the Media, posted on May 16, 2003 to Reason Online. “Today,” he goes on to say, “any literate American with an opinion can publish his views and distribute them widely.  Increasingly successful mainstream outlets (cf. Fox) wear their politics on their sleeves.  And anyone with a computer has instant access to papers from all over the world, laying bare the national prejudices that underlie the ‘objective’ media of each country.”

Personally, I like what Will Rogers had to say about the media: “All I know is just what I read in the newspapers, and that’s an alibi for my ignorance.”  It’s nice to have an excuse.

All wise media consumers should assume that organizations with an agenda, to include the U.S. government and its enemies abroad, spread disinformation, so much so that even fair-minded reporters will not always agree on the facts.  No organization is completely safe from fabulists and plagiarists.  In fact, this paragraph itself is a minimally paraphrased exerpt from Jesse Walker’s article, previously cited. I disguised his words with a few happy-to-glads… still plagiarism.  So, we should all be on the lookout for everyone’s biases, including our own.  You and I, son, are such wise consumers.  Everyone else? Well, they’re biased. 😉

To post a comment, click on the tiny COMMENTS word below.

Published in: on June 30, 2006 at 1:46 pm  Leave a Comment  

The End of Democracy

“Looks like Kennedy (in another plurality opinion) by a nose invalidating the wacky Congressional District 23,” reports Daliah Withwick, senior editor for Slate in her Breakfast Table, A Supreme Court Conversation, speaking of the Court’s recent concurrence with a lower court’s decision on redistricting in Texas. “All else,” she goes on to say, “remains foggy, although a fast look suggests yet another insane mess of opinions in which various justices pop in and out of various portions of the opinion like a big game of constitutional whack-a-mole.”

No doubt we will hear more about this as more knowledgeable judicial analysts digest the Court’s decision in the coming days and weeks.  But, no matter what We The People think, the decision stands, our consternation notwithstanding.  This much is for sure, it’s going to go down in the history books as being right up there in significance with Marbury vs. Madison. Why?  Because it means that there is nothing unconstitutionally (legally) wrong with gerrymandering.  From now on, the ruling party can legally stack the deck, hence, the beginning of the end of true democracy in the United States.

Now, I’m no lawyer, but I can read, and I think the justices were wrong.  They were right in their reading, the Constitution doesn’t specifically forbid redistricting more often than every ten years, but they were wrong in their interpretation/understanding of the Framers’ intent.

To determine the number of representatives a state shall have, the Constitution prescribes that an enumeration (census) shall be made every ten years, but no more.  So it is evident to me that the Framers’ intent was that this census should be used as a guide to the process of selecting representatives.

The Constitution addresses the subject in Article I, Section 2, Clause 3:  Representatives and direct Taxes shall be apportioned among the several States which may be included within this Union, according to their respective Numbers, which shall be determined by adding to the whole Number of free Persons, including those bound to Service for a Term of Years, and excluding Indians not taxed, three fifths of all other Persons.) (The previous sentence in parentheses was superseded by Amendment XIV, section 2.) The actual Enumeration shall be made within three Years after the first Meeting of the Congress of the United States, and within every subsequent Term of ten Years, in such Manner as they shall by Law direct. The Number of Representatives shall not exceed one for every thirty Thousand, but each State shall have at Least one Representative; and until such enumeration shall be made, the State of New Hampshire shall be entitled to chusethree, Massachusetts eight, Rhode Island and Providence Plantations one, Connecticut five, New York six, New Jersey four, Pennsylvania eight, Delaware one, Maryland six, Virginia ten, North Carolina five, South Carolina five and Georgia three.

So, what’s to become of us?  Unless we stop thinking of ourselves as Democrats or Republicans and start casting our votes for the candidate(s) of our choice rather than the party of our choice, we will soon have an oligarchy (government in which all power belongs to a limited number of persons) in the United States.  Hmmmm… that’s pretty much what we’ve already got, is it not?  But if some balance is not restored in the Congress between conservatives and liberals in the upcoming November elections, I will have to agree with everything James Bovard says in his book, Attention Deficit Democracy.

To post a comment, click on the tiny COMMETS word below.

Published in: on June 29, 2006 at 7:51 pm  Leave a Comment  

It’s a Wonderful List

 movieguys.gif

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

If you haven’t discovered it yet, the Washington Post sponsors an excellent on-line source of news, information, commentary, and tasteful (in my humble opinion) advertisements… if it weren’t for all those glitzy pop-ups.  It’s a powerful, professionally published weblog called Slate.  In today’s edition, you will find a posting on the American Film Institutes (AFI) listing of the 100 most inspiring movies of all time.  The posting is entitled, It’s a Wonderful List. Check it out by clicking on the preceding link, and see if you agree with the list.

Personally, although I take exception in some cases to the order of the movies, I found all my favorites on the list except “Gladiator.”  Hmmmm… maybe there’s something weird about me; I’m looking forward to seeing the latest Superman movie too.

You will find the actual AFI list and a discussion on how they came up with it by clicking on a hyperlink you will find the first paragraph of Slate’s article.

😀

Published in: on June 29, 2006 at 4:25 pm  Leave a Comment  

We’re Taking It Back

Give me your tired, your poor, your huddled masses yearning to breathe free.”  These words, from Emma Lazarus’ famous poem, “The New Colossus,” were written in 1883 and engraved on a plaque that was placed at the base of the Statue of Liberty.  To this day, her poem influences the way we think about freedom and exile, about our nation and about the people in it.  We are indeed a nation of immigrants, increasingly and problematically so.

As a teacher of World Geography in Texas, I generally have a cross-section of races and ethnicities in my classroom.  About a third of my students are typically white-Anglo, a third are African American, and a third are Hispanic — mostly first- and second-generation immigrants from Mexico.  Many of this last third of students have poor English skills, while a few have none, speaking and reading no English whatsoever.  Providing for their special needs in education is increasingly a challenge for school districts in Texas.  But, we do the best we can.  Generally, I pair a bi-lingual student of the same ethnicity with students who can neither understand a word I say nor read a word from our textbook.  They act as interpreters.

Quite surprisingly to me, most of my students are tolerant and respectful of one another’s cultural inheritance.  And that’s a good thing.

One of my young Hispanic men last year was something of a militant.  He was very active and involved in organizing other students to boycott classes and join in on the public demon- strations that were held in our area against immigration reform.  But he was an engaging young man too, contributing an intelligent, informed perspective to our classroom discussions on matters that he cared deeply about.  He was also the class clown.  Every class has one.

One day, when we were talking about Manifest Destiny – how the United States grew to span the entire continent “from sea to shining sea,” this young man raised his hand.  “Mr. Garry,” he asked, “Do you know that Texas was once part of Mexico, and that the United States took it from us?”

“Actually,” I said, “history books, even those written and printed in Mexico, acknowledge that ‘Tejas’ was lost, not to the United States, but to ‘The Republic of Texas’ following the Battle of San Jacinto in 1836.  Mexico’s president at that time, Antonio Lopez de Santa Anna, signed it over to the people of Texas as part of the terms of surrender offered to him.  Texas became an independent republic, even though the people wanted to be part of the United States.  Texas did not join the union until 1845 because of the slave issue.”

“Yeah,” he said, “well… we’re taking it back.”

At this, the classroom burst into laughter.  I too had to smile because, even though what this student said wasn’t terribly funny, he spoke a very obvious truth, one that hasn’t occurred to most American citizens, and we seem powerless to do anything about it.  Our nation is indeed rapidly becoming part of Mexico.  Remember all the Mexican flags carried during the first couple of demon- stration marches.  It wasn’t until demonstration organizers started telling people to leave their flags at home that we started seeing American flags carried, ostensibly to suggest immigrants’ allegiance to this country.

On another occasion, we were studying Mexico.  One of the key concepts for students to understand in this lesson was the process of urbanization, the growth of cities.  With the economy of Mexico rapidly shifting away from agriculture to mining, manufacturing, and services, the people of Mexico are migrating en-mass from rural areas to the urban areas.  In fact, according to our textbook, most Mexicans today live in the largest city in the world (in terms of population), Mexico City.  Reviewing my students on what they should have learned from their viewing of an education video and reading, I asked the class, “Where do most Mexicans live, students?”

Without bothering to raise his hand, my class clown blurted out, “Los Angeles!”

Some Americans are very angry about the problems that so many illegal immigrants are causing, I’ve heard that there are as many as 15 million, but does anybody really know?  Crime rates are up, insurance rates are up, healthcare costs are up, and more and more young Hispanics are dropping out of school to swell the ranks of citizens who can’t find decent jobs.  Some, like many of my students, feel like the immigration issue is “much ado about nothing,” that illegals are actually good for the economy, so we should leave them alone.  Most, I suspect, are like me, in a quandary.  But I agree with our President on this one, we do very badly need meaningful, comprehensive, and enforceable immigration reform.  And it’s the responsibility of Congress to act on this great need.  This is much more important, in my mind, than debating issues like the constitutional amendment on marriage or flag-burning.  These issues just pander to special-interest constituents for reelection purposes, and tabling the debate on immigration until after the November election just proves how spineless and self-centered our lawmakers in Washington are.

If you’re in agreement with me on this, I invite you to checkout one or more of the following websites: Americans for Limited Government, Clean Up Washington, or Citizen.

To post a comment, click on the tiny COMMENTS word below.

Published in: on June 28, 2006 at 3:39 pm  Leave a Comment